About Me

Name: zyphlus
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Blog Roll

 

Rush Limbaugh deserves the Nobel Peace Price

 Rush Limbaugh deserves the Nobel Peace Price

I could think of few people who are more deserving of a Nobel Peace Prize than Rush Limbaugh. He has worked tirelessly to end the partisanship that the democrats and the media have forced on us.

As the pew research center proved out Rush Limbaugh listeners are the most knowledgably informed of all broadcast media and a close second only to readers of the published media New Republic/ Weekly Standard (read neo-con [I’m not saying that in a Anti-Semitic way since I agree with a majority of neo-con positions.]) The 1990s DNC focus groups discovered that people, even kooky progressives, who listen to him become Conservatives. Why do you think they launched the failed Scare America? (http://people-press.org/reports/display.php3?PageID=1068)

Rush’s ability to speak truth to kooks has transformed the debate in the US not in how to get along with kooky progressive peace at any price nuts but how to push forward a true peace loving conservative platform. The cornerstone of the conservative platform is peace through strength. And unfortunately when evil men exist the debate must asked is peace more important than freedom? Will you subjugate yourself to internal enslavement and its modern by-products: communist/ socialist enforced poverty, clitorectomy and fear of recalcitrant criminals for the result of peace? For many of us the answer is no and the resulting proper operational theorem Peace through War is the only choice. Can we do this everywhere? No, but where evil exists and USA interests lie the opportunity should be taken to bring self-determined freedom and peace. Rush I think is a champion of true peace including freedom of the individual. He correctly identified the proper exit strategy in Iraq and Afghanistan: to WIN! His understanding of Peace unfortunately is vastly outstrips that of the Nobel Peace Prize committee; for that reason I fear he will not be awarded this prize he so richly deserves.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

ABC Playing with Fire

ABC Playing with Fire

Although I’m a Midwest Catholic not a Southern Baptist, I honored the Southern Baptist boycott of Disney-ABC-Eisner. This was not an easy matter. I have two children 3 ½ and almost 2. I can’t count the times I had to remind family, friends and relatives not to purchase any Disney related products for our family. Still we had to ship or hand back more than two handfuls of gifts to family, friends, coworkers and bosses with a polite explanation of how Disney’s anti-Christian bias forced us to make a stand. I gave up watching my favorite sport, hockey. In particular, watching Detroit Red Wing playoff hockey on ABC and ESPN. My wife was often forced to go that extra mile sometimes purchasing an inferior product be it at Wal-mart or Target in order to avoid Disney products. We even cheered when the Winnie-the-Pooh estate filed suit to separate from Disney. Hoping that if the estate won I could share one of my favorite childhood stories with my children too. Unfortunately, the suit failed to wrestle Pooh, Roo, Tiger, Eeyore, and Piglet from Disney.

With the parting of Michael Eisner, the very hour in fact, I called my wife and said I think it’s time to end the Boycott of Disney. It must have been the same week that I heard the Southern Baptist were ending their boycott of Disney. It seems we were both rationally acting in concert. I had purchased a Winnie-the-Pooh DVD and my little ones entered ‘honey’ and ‘bounce’ into their vocabulary that week.

But this week I am growing very anxious. If ABC decides to significantly edit or block “The Path to 9/11” I fell I must re-instigate my previous boycott of Disney. I’m from the financial world and know that the previous boycott was not totally ineffective. Disney ‘DIS’ never again made it above the 42 dollar range in 9 years and to this day trades at a 30% discount to that $42 range. I feel they significantly hurt their bottom line with their previous anti-Christian bias. I understand that as a Christian White Conservative Male who votes Republican that Disney hates me. I’m fine with that as long as they don’t say so or act like it.

I would ask ABC to think before they cave into the Liberals. With all the other crap I still have to put up with from ABC, John Stossel being the notable exception, I don’t think that for just once having Liberal Democrats and Conservative Republicans bashed at the same time is too much to ask. And from my reading of “The Path to 9/11” Democrats may be justly getting whacked a little harder but I have no doubt that it is justified. In addition, I think if ABC chooses to run the original cut they may well fine a growing support in the Conservative movement for their product lines. In the near future I’ll have to decide where to take a $2,000-3,000 kid theme park vacation and Disney would do well to remember that the left’s Boycotts are small in nature and largely ineffectual. I don’t think there are many vegan anti-corporate anti-multinational peaceniks with kids who aren’t already boycotting Disney for the oppression of the small world people left. Disney needs to understand it’s future depends on kids and people who have kids. Their target market according to census data is increasing Christian Conservative Republicans families and they would do well to remember it.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Four Ring Circus; the Missed Federal Branch of Government

 

Four Ring Circus; the Missed Federal Branch of Government

In Charles Adams’ For Good and Evil: The Impact of Taxes on the Course of Civilization he points out the biggest failing of modern government is the dual role of appropriation and expenditure ie. taxing and spending. We have seen the rapid and uncontrollable growth of government once it left what was mostly not absolutely the domain of conservative government:
1) Courts for the adjudication of civil disagreements and criminal cases (murder, theft, contract disputes)
2) Internal Security (FBI, Secret Service, Coast Guard, NEST)
3) External Security (Army, Navy, Air Force, Marines, Special Forces, CIA, NSA)

The rapid expansion into Health and Human Services, building stadiums, funding operas, art, etc has led to this uncontrolled beast of a government. This creates an increased likelihood for the corruption in the system. Fewer government contracts would make the misappropriation of scarce funds more difficult. Fewer contracts allows for better oversight public and governmental.

Why so blue Panda Bear? Don’t get depressed. I know of a solution. Now I’m gonna mention the unmentionable. The US Constitution forgot a ring of government. It should be a four-ring not a three-ring circus. Who or what is the forth ring? The ‘Taxuary’ is the forgotten forth-ring.


What the heck is the Taxuary? It simply would function to exclusively raise ALL Government Revenues. It would have the exclusive right to levy all legal taxes be they income, sales, import, export, or common/uncommon fees. In addition they would have the power to Issue Bonds in times of Declared War.

What are the benefits? Most importantly you create an inherent conflict in government. Those that tax can’t spend and those that spend can’t tax. They finally will have to fight each other. No more my bridge to nowhere pork swap for your study of rainforests in Iowa {that’s Jungle to most of you http://www.conway.com/ssinsider/bbdeal/bd010108.htm .} Creating this inherent conflict would encourage each congressman to discover others pork project in order to find additional revenues for his projects be they pork or legitimate.

Whine… well there will still be Department of War/Defense Pork… Yes you right. You can’t get rid of it all but even here thou you will create a modus operandi { http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modus_operandi} to create efficiency of contract awards. The tactical fighter contract in your district demands that the tactical bomber contract in the other district be run in the most efficient manner possible. 535 congressmen would also now be in inherent conflict with each other for these scare funds. Oh they will blame the Taxuary and call them names. Warms my heart to think of it.


Where has this worked before? Funny you should ask. James VI of Scotland/James I of England and Ireland and later his son Charles I both had very restricted rights of raising revenue and had to fight their Parliaments for increased revenues. Eventually leading to the end of Charles I reign, the Monarchy and Charles I himself. The Swiss civilians vote on taxes and elected official pay. {hint they have lower rates}


The Outline of theTaxuary. My first inclination was to elect 1 person from every state to serve on the Taxuary. The hoi polloi {yes I know that reads ‘the the many’ and is redundant http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hoi_polloi .} would vote every 2 years for a person based on would they or wouldn’t they raise taxes or issue bonds in times of declared war. The Taxuary would NOT be allowed to direct, earmark or spend any money. The Taxuary directs the government to raise revenues and than releases that money to congress for expenditures. I would think that a 1 day monthly meeting of the Taxuary would be sufficient to accomplish the task. I get the feeling that congress would have to meet allot less than presently.

The Taxuary should be given the power to investigate congressional ethics complaints and present violations to the Supreme Court. In addition they would determine the salary of congress at large. The Taxuary pay should be determined by the hoi polloi. Ethics violations by the Taxuary are to be investigated by random civilian grand juries and presented to Supreme Court for adjudication. The Taxuary would also have the additional responsibility of overseeing 3 ‘Independent’ audits of the Government by public accountants. Black Budget items by NSA, Defense, or FBI are to be audited by 1 accountant group consisting of half military and half Civilian no ex-congressman/ administration officials like John Danforth or Hugh Hewitt.

Returning to Congressional Declarations of War would be a nice change. A Declaration of War by the Congress would encourage the Taxuary to increase funds to the Treasury using bonds and/or taxation. This would have an effect of the increasing the likelihood of Congressmen voting for War Declarations. I think some minor fiddling need to be done here. The President should have to ask Congress for the Declaration of War. While the President still has the right to respond militarily; protracted or massive operations that require excessive funding, would inevitably need Declarations of War and Congressional and Taxuary support. I know the Congress would have an increased motivation to declare war {I think it’s safe to say now [Korea, Vietnam, Iraq, Afghanistan, Iraq] that we need to increase proper constitutional government functions.} Hopefully we could keep excessive/ improper Declarations in check with Popular Vote of the Taxuary. Fearful of being thrown out of office by the masses they would have to tread lightly.


I stayed at the Holiday Inn Express last year so I thought I could design a federal branch of government. I’m looking for ideas. I have played with the idea of having the Governor/ State Congressmen functioning as the Taxuary but my fear is that while the states would function as a check on federal powers they might be perverted by various Federals money sharing shenanigans.


Hopefully I will move this blog over to an exclusive Constitutional Blog site to discuss why Commerce, State, and the Postal Office had to be included in the constitution and yet the HHS, EPA didn’t require an Amendment.

 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »